Employment Law and Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Employment Law and Policy - Essay ExampleFirst, when they went to meet with Ms. Young, they should have waited for the future(a) meeting time as she did not deny addressing their issues. They began their journey to the headquarters. Second, while investigating the matters highlighted by the three nurses, Custer did not observe the similar discontent from the incision heads that was portrayed by the three nurses rather, the department heads supported Ms. Young. Third, the department heads informed about their reservations over the unprofessional abide and behavior of the three nurses. Fourth, the Ms. Young also complained about the improper and lack of cooperation from the three nurses. Subsequent to that, when Custer asked each person at the meeting for the names of the people he or she thought creditworthy for the tension at the Heartland facility, a considerable number of counts highlighted the major involvement of the three nurses. More importantly, when in March, the HR Direc tor Custer was announcing his decisions resolving the issue rebelliousness and resistance to change was personally felt by the Director that was largely contributed by the three nurses. In almost every organization, a code of conduct is established and the employees are required to support and follow the requirements of it. Mostly, a number of organizations emphasize its enforcement so that the smooth functioning of the organization must remain busy and continue. However, the conduct of the three nurses did not respect the established code of conduct rather, they went against it.... However, the conduct of the three nurses did not respect the established code of conduct rather, they went against it. And, the posterior investigation proved and necessitated the employment termination of the three nurses. Impasses, Strikes, and Dispute Resolution The Mackay doctrine permits employers to hire permanent stand-in workers for strikers (Hatton, 2011, p. 97). However, the United States a lso maintains that its laws guarantee the even off of association and the right to strike and that the Mackay doctrine must not violate the right to strike (Compa & Diamond, 1996, p.35). The inverse seniority step violates the sanctity of the particle 8(a) (1) of the NLRA. This Section maintains that any attempt by the employers shall be deemed as an unfair labor practice that interfere with, coerce or restrain employees in the exercise of their rights to assemble or assist labor organizations, or not to assist or join labor organizations. The inverse seniority option offered by the Child share Services Inc. (CCSI) represents a clear act of interfering in the employee rights to assist or perform labor organization related activities and the inverse seniority would meet the replacements first for the most senior members and, in the very first attempt of replacement, the main union members of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) would be repl aced in the cause of strike this action directly breaches the workers rights and puts additional pressure on them so that they should avoid exercising their legal rights for obtaining their objectives. On the other hand, Mackay doctrine permits the employers to hire replacement workers in the